Feedback

get in contact, ask questions, give feedback

How was this website discovered?

The reference to the website was seen on site at the Düwelsteene.

The website was discovered by chance.

A recommendation drew attention to the website.

Are the texts and images informative?

The texts are too short and there are too many pictures.

The amount of text and images is well chosen.

There is too much text on the website, more images would be better.

Are the 3D models aesthetically successful?

The reconstructions are too abstract.

The 3D models and the visually highlighted reconstructions are well done.

The reconstructions are too realistic.

Does the digital reconstructions reveal the build and structure of the tomb?

Yes, the reconstructions illustrate the appearance of the tomb before 1932 and around 3000 BC.

Still undecided.

No, the reconstructions do not help with the representation of the grave in earlier times.

Is the use of a 3D viewer for visualization helpful?

Yes, the application of 3D models with annotations connects image and text.

No, more text as the information medium would be more helpful.

No, reconstruction images in conjunction with text would have sufficed as visualization.

Is navigating in the 3D viewer plausible?

The navigation is self-explanatory and simple.

Navigating the 3D viewer could be grasped and is adequate.

The navigation is too complicated and difficult to understand.

Has this website been able to provide more knowledge about the megalithic tomb?

Yes, the website contributed to new knowledge and was able to answer many questions.

Still undecided.

No, the website has hardly been able to impart any new knowledge.

Can this website be recommended?

Yes, the website can be recommended.

Still undecided.

No, the website cannot be recommended.

Questions or remarks: